Categories: AI Bypasser, AI Code Assistant, AI Copilot, AI Interview Assistant

Interview Solver: An AI Copilot for Coding Interviews?

SirKris

Writer

f 𝕏 P in

Let's be real for a second. The modern tech interview is… something else. We've all been there. Staring at a CoderPad or a HackerRank screen, your mind a complete blank, while an interviewer silently judges your every keystroke. You’ve spent weeks, maybe months, grinding LeetCode, trying to cram every algorithm and data structure into your brain. All for a 45-minute performance that often feels more like a test of short-term memory than actual engineering skill.

It's a broken system. Many of us feel it. We complain about it on Twitter and Blind. But we still have to play the game.

So, what if you had a secret weapon? A little ghost in the machine, whispering the perfect solution in your ear, right when you need it most. That's the bold, slightly scandalous promise of a tool I stumbled upon recently: Interview Solver. And honestly, my first reaction was,

Whoa. They actually built it.

This isn't just another AI code generator. This is a tool specifically designed to be your copilot during a live, screenshared coding interview. It’s provocative, it’s controversial, and I absolutely had to take a closer look.

So, What Exactly is Interview Solver?

At its heart, Interview Solver is a desktop AI application. Think of it as a digital Cyrano de Bergerac for coders. You're in the interview, you get hit with a tough problem—maybe a tricky graph traversal or a dynamic programming question you haven't seen before—and instead of panicking, you discreetly get the answer. The app works by either reading the text you highlight on your screen or by analyzing a quick screengrab of the problem.

Visit Interview Solver

It then generates a complete solution, often with explanations, right there on your desktop. The core selling point, and the part that raises eyebrows, is that it's built from the ground up to be completely invisible to the person on the other end of the call. No screen-sharing detection, no weird pop-ups. Just you, your screen, and your AI-powered secret agent.

The "Ghost in the Machine" Features

When I say it’s designed for stealth, I’m not kidding. The feature set reads less like a developer tool and more like something out of a spy movie. It's clear the creators understood the exact pain points of a live, proctored interview.

Designed for Ultimate Discretion

The main concern anyone would have is, obviously, getting caught. Interview Solver addresses this head-on. Its Transparency Mode lets you make the app's window semi-transparent, so you can overlay it on your code editor and see both at once. It’s sneaky. The Companion Mode is even simpler: just run the app on a second monitor that you aren't sharing. Classic.

But the real kicker is the Undetectable Hotkeys. Most proctoring software can log key combinations. These global hotkeys are supposedly designed to fly under the radar, letting you capture a problem or trigger a function without raising any red flags. It’s a very specific solution to a very specific problem.

More Than Just Code Snippets

This isn't just for LeetCode grinds. The Screengrab tool is pretty clever—if the problem is in an image or a non-selectable format, you just draw a box around it. Problem solved. Literally.

What really caught my eye, though, was the Voice Transcription. The app can listen to the interviewer's voice and transcribe what they're saying. This is huge for system design interviews, where the question is often a long, rambling prompt. You can get a transcript to refer back to, ensuring you dont miss a critical requirement. They've also added support for Flowcharts & Diagrams, pushing its utility firmly into the system design territory, which is a whole other beast of an interview.

Let's Talk Turkey: The Price of an Edge

Okay, so what does this powerful, ethically-gray-area tool cost? I was expecting some kind of tiered, confusing pricing structure, but it's refreshingly simple.

Thirty-nine bucks a month. That's it. When you put that number next to the potential salary jump from landing a job at Google or Netflix (salaries they cheekily display on their pricing page), it's positioned as a no-brainer investment. For someone on the job hunt, facing multiple rounds of interviews, that $39 could feel like a very small price to pay for a massive confidence boost and a potential six-figure salary.

The Elephant in the Room... Is This Cheating?

Look, we can't talk about a tool like this without addressing the massive ethical elephant in the room. Is using Interview Solver cheating? The short answer is... yeah, probably. You're presenting a solution generated by an AI as your own work in a test environment. It’s hard to argue otherwise.

But I think the more interesting question is: Why does a tool like this even exist?

It exists because the tech interview process, particularly at large companies, is often seen as a performative, high-pressure circus that has little to do with the day-to-day job of being a software engineer. No one is asking you to invert a binary tree on a whiteboard with a deadline in your regular sprint. As tech personality DHH (creator of Ruby on Rails) has famously argued, these kinds of tests select for a very specific skill: passing the test.

From one perspective, a tool like Interview Solver is just an equalizer. It’s a response to a flawed system. It helps brilliant engineers who just happen to be terrible at live-pressure algorithm puzzles. It can be a lifeline for someone with anxiety who freezes up, or a senior dev who has spent the last decade building incredible systems but hasn't touched a competitive programming problem since college.

The counterargument is just as strong, of course. Using this tool is fundamentally dishonest. It erodes trust. And what happens when you get the job? If you can't actually solve problems without an AI crutch, you're not going to last long. It also devalues the immense effort of those who genuinely put in the work to learn these concepts inside and out.

In my opinion, it's a tool. And like any tool, its morality is defined by its user. It could be a crutch that prevents learning, or it could be a safety net that allows an otherwise-qualified candidate to show their strengths without being derailed by a single, arbitrary question.

Who is This Tool Actually For?

I don't think this is for a fresh-faced beginner trying to fake their way into a job they can't do. That's a recipe for disaster. But I can see a few profiles who might find this genuinely useful.

• The Anxious Performer: You know your stuff, but the pressure of a live audience makes your brain shut down. This could be the confidence boost you need to get through it.
• The Rusty Veteran: You're a senior engineer with years of real-world experience, but you're out of practice with the specific type of algorithmic hazing common in interviews today.
• The Non-Traditional Candidate: Maybe you're self-taught or from a bootcamp, and you have practical skills but gaps in your theoretical CS knowledge that you're working on.

The danger is obvious: over-reliance. If you use this to bypass learning entirely, you're only cheating yourself. It should be a safety net, not a replacement for knowledge. A crutch, not a replacement for legs.

My Final Thoughts on Interview Solver

Interview Solver is one of the most fascinating and disruptive tools I've seen in the tech hiring space in a long time. It’s a well-made, feature-rich application that does exactly what it promises: it gives you an almost unfair advantage in live coding interviews.

While the immediate reaction is to label it a "cheat tool," I think that misses the larger point. The very existence and popularity of a tool like this is a powerful critique of the system it's designed to game. It holds a mirror up to tech hiring and forces us to ask if we're really testing for the right things.

Will it get you a job? Maybe. Should you use it? That’s a question you have to answer for yourself. But one thing is for sure: it has definitely started a conversation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Interview Solver detectable by proctoring software?

According to its creators, the tool is specifically designed as a native desktop app (not a browser extension) with undetectable hotkeys to avoid being flagged by common anti-cheating and screen-sharing software. However, no system is ever 100% foolproof.

Can I use this for system design interviews too?

Yes. With features like voice transcription to capture long prompts and the new ability to generate flowcharts and diagrams, it's positioned as a helper for both coding and system design rounds.

How does the voice transcription feature work?

It uses your computer's microphone to listen to the interviewer's audio and provides a live, written transcript of the conversation. This helps you keep track of all the requirements and constraints, especially in complex, multi-part questions.

What happens if I rely on this tool too much?

This is the main risk. Relying on it excessively can prevent you from developing your own problem-solving skills. If you get a job using the tool but lack the underlying knowledge, you will likely struggle to perform your duties, which could jeopardize your position.

Is paying $39 a month for Interview Solver really worth it?

This depends on your situation. If you are actively interviewing for high-paying tech roles, the cost can be seen as a small investment for a potentially huge return in salary and confidence. It's less than the cost of many professional coaching services.

Are there any alternatives to Interview Solver?

While there are many AI code assistants like GitHub Copilot, most are designed for development, not for live, discreet interview assistance. Interview Solver's specific focus on being undetectable during screensharing makes it fairly unique in its category right now.

Reference and Sources

• Interview Solver Official Website
• Interview Solver Pricing Page
• A Tweet from DHH on Whiteboard Interviews - A sample of the ongoing industry debate.